![]() Note some macro lenses operate at a slightly slower maximum aperture at certain focusing distances. Focus was achieved using live-view and a little optimization by hand and performed separately for the center and corners to avoid any effect from field curvature. Processing was done in CaptureNX2 at standard settings, with white-balance adjusted to a neutral white and some exposure compensation to make the brightness match. And in each part we’ll be showing the 40/2.8G in the first column, the 85/3.5G in the second column and the 105/2.8G in the third column. This following comparison of Siemens-star test-shots comes in four parts: normal center, normal DX corner, macro center, macro DX corner. The other thing to keep in mind is that the performance of the 105/2.8G is shown for the FX image-circle (21.5mm radius) while the charts for both DX-lenses only go to 14mm radius So what we need to compare these lenses are real test-shots with a challenging target: the Siemens-stars. As lenses sharpen up pretty quickly when stopped down (at least up to f5.6) there is no way to know or calculate how the 40/1.4G or 105/2.8G perform at f/3.5 from these charts. When comparing the MTF-charts of those three lenses you should not forget that this is not on an apples-to-apples basis: The chart for the f2.8-lenses shows performance at f2.8, a disadvantage of 2/3 of a stop compared to the 85/3.5G. To read these charts you only have to understand that higher values are better and that the closer the dotted and the continuous lines are together the less astigmatism (= resolution depending on the orientation of the test-pattern) the lens displays. These charts show the lens-performance at the largest aperture. The 40mm lens has the simplest construction (which is not necessarily bad) while the 85mm and 105mm designs are more complex and look pretty similar to each-other. The following images show the cross-section through the lenses, ED glass elements are depicted in yellow. These results accompany dedicated reviews of each of the three lenses, so to find out more, please check them out at the following links: Since two of the three are only corrected for the DX-format, I’ve used a DX body to test them. On this page I’m comparing the optical quality of the latest three Micro-Nikkors, the DX 40mm f2.8G, DX 85mm f3.5G VR and the 105mm f2.8G VR. And finally, the 85mm and 105mm models also sport Vibration Reduction facilities to combat camera shake. The 40mm and 85mm are DX models which means they’re only corrected for use on DX-format bodies with smaller APS-C sensors, while the 60mm and 105mm will work on any Nikon DSLR including full-frame FX-format models. These are all known as Micro-Nikkors and of the six modern options, two are specialist PC-E tilt-shift models, leaving four for general macro use: the DX 40mm f2.8G, 60mm f2.8G, DX 85mm f3.5G VR and 105mm f2.8G VR.Īll four are AF-S lenses, which means they’ll autofocus on any Nikon DSLR including entry-level models. Nikon offers no fewer than six modern macro lenses designed for close-up photography, and still sells four older models in some regions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |